Super PACS guided the era of the new speech and improved American democracy than I imagined. And a few years ago, I made the first one.
On March 26, 2010, the Columbia Special District Court decided Speechnow.org V. Federal election committee (FEC) Unanimously raised the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act, which is unanimously independent of the Independent Expenditure Committee.
In this case, I am proud of being the manuscript. While doing Citizens United v. FEC In the basin political speech itself, the commentators often offer credit (or criticism) of the super PAC. anniversary Speechnow It seems to be the right time to set the record straight.
Citizens’ Union It is established that companies and unions can make independent spending in the political campaign. but, Speechnow He acknowledged the first correctional authority of an individual to collect resources for independent political speeches.
why Speechnow Is it still too important for 15 years? The Super PAC fundamentally conveyed its promise to expand the political language rights guaranteed by the first amendment.
~ Inside Berkeley V. Valeo (1976), according to a groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling on campaign finance, the court ruled that an individual could spend an unlimited amount of independently advocating or advocating candidates. that Speechnow The decision took the next logical stage. The first amendment protects the rights of more than 2, 10 or 10,000 citizens to collect resources to speak as much as they want.
What can be more Americans than that? Those who share their beliefs talk about forming a group, contributing to the group, and using funds to speak of fellow citizens and those who need to dominate our nation.
This reinforced freedom has a significant impact, making the campaign more beneficial and competitive.
First, as the employees are afraid of, the campaign is more controversial than taking considerable measures for decades. In 2010, the Republican Party had 63 seats since 1948. The Democratic Party has won 40 seats since 1974 and has been number one twice since 1974. In the Senate, the Democratic Party lost nine seats. Since President Ronald Reagan won in 1980, he lost the most upside down seats. The White House party has changed three hands since 2016.
Super PACS also helps voters who get more information about campaign spending candidates. This new group is an important factor in recording expenditures for federal campaigns, has more than doubled since 2008 and has gained profits from most parliamentary races. But roughly I spent $ 16 billion in the last election The cycle is still less than our quantity I sent it to the potato chip.
All of these spending helped increase turnout in 2020. The highest over 100 years, 2024 Election Near moment. I don’t claim that the correlation is the cause, but critics claim democracy that threatens the ruling. The terrible warning has been proven on a huge basis.
Perhaps most decisive Speechnow Meaning political communication has recognized that resources are needed. Spending money to reach voters in more than 330 million countries is a prerequisite for an effective political discourse. By eliminating artificial constraints on political organizations Speechnow I liberated and strengthened political speeches.
Truly free political speeches can achieve powerful results. In 1967, the opposition to the Vietnam War continued. Fortunately, there was no limit to giving money to the candidate campaign committee at the time, and allowed wealthy reversal liberals to allow funds to Eugene McCarthy’s Lyndon B. Johnson. They spent more than $ 13 million in the campaign in New Hampshire. McCarthy couldn’t win, but all were shocked. 42 %of the votingIt was a turning point for the political opposition to the war with the LBJ out of the competition.
at New York Times V. Sullivan controlThe Supreme Court mentioned that “our profound national dedication to the principle that the debate on public issues is not valid, strong and extensively open.” It is an insult of this promise that incumbent politicians have the authority to limit how much we can spend funds to criticize them.
15 years later SpeechnowNow is the time to recognize that essential wisdom. Restricting the money that citizens can spend on political speech means limiting our freedom of speech.
The last 15 years of experience has proved that more language, not the government’s limitations of language, best preserves our freedom and American democracy.
