One of my long -term professors, not economists but not political conservatives, said Adam Smith tried to reduce him as a more interesting and interesting and free market fundamental -cutting disciple than his many critics. For example, I have been criticized by Smith’s (without information). Smith assumes that everyone wants to buy and sell when everyone prefers to dominate and take it. bloodAolo Santori said, “Persuasion: Role Sexual desire In the thoughts of Adam Smith ” (Politics2025, 1-18).
Santori seems to prefer Latin. Sexual desireBut as he pointed out, Smith wrote about “love for domination” and “love you’s love.” The following is a discussion of Smith about the desire to dominate in the context of the master to dominate slaves. Nation (Book III, Chapter 2). Smith wrote:
I show that all ages and nation’s experiences are the most precious, but the work performed by slaves is only expensive for maintenance. Those who can’t acquire property can not have any interest, but they can work as enemies as much as possible. It is not his own interest, but only by violence, not his own interests. In ancient Italy, Pliny and Columella are all mentioned in how much corn cultivation is deteriorated, and how much profit from the master when it fell under slave management. In the Aristotle era, it was not much better in ancient Greece. …
Human pride makes him love Domineer and does not deprive him of being obliged to persuade his inferior people. Wherever the law is, the essence of that work can handle it, so he usually prefers slaves over the service of Freeman. Planting sugar and cigarettes can afford the sacrifice of slave culture. Increasing corn seems to be unable to do it in the present time. In the British colonies, where the main agricultural products are corn, Freeman performs much more of this work. … In our sugar colonies, on the contrary, the entire work is done by slaves, and there is a very large part in tobacco colonies. In West Indian colonies, sugar deliberations are generally much larger than other cultivation in Europe or the United States. And inferior to sugar, but the interests of tobacco farms are superior to corn as already observed. Both can afford to spend slave culture, but sugar can still be better than cigarettes. As a result, the number of blacks is much larger in proportion to white people in sugar than tobacco colonies.
Santori Moral and Law. He argued that other authors sometimes interpreted Smith’s “pride” as the fundamentals of “love for Domine You.”
Santori argues that more convincing interpretation is a sin of “pride” in the context. He quotes Smith Moral: “” Proud people do not always feel themselves comfortably in their own equality companies, and they are still less than his boss’s company. ” Santori insists on this kind of pride and argues that there is no need to agree to persuade or agree with time or energy. In fact, this “love for Domineer” is a strong enough to give up some of the material benefits that can be held by hiring free labor.
In this part NationSmith is discussing the historical transition to a commercial society in feudal. In that context, Santori insists:
We have read the jurisdiction (LJ) and the lectures with wealth. … smith Sexual desire. But he knew that the commercial society could not be eliminated. Sexual desire And every time the socioeconomic situation allows, humans will try to dominate each other. He saw this in the colony and specific markets. …
For Smith, a commercial society is a more mature way to conceive life in a community. In contrast, love for domination expresses the childish things that want to get everything without effort. Humans can thrive when they learn how to live in a society that cannot be forced to compel. They should deal with the goals and opinions of others in a relationship based on persuasion rather than domination. Adult life in commercial society needs something better than the love of domination. Here I am expanding the claim of Smith, but I hope to be faithful to his spirit.
The general dissatisfaction with the so -called “free market” is that you don’t feel especially “freedom”, such as when working in the morning or when the bill is closed. Moreover, the hierarchical structure of commercial companies and markets provides a range of “Domineer” people. But “Love for Domineer” does not disappear from a country where the market and politics are not free, and can appear in a much more unpleasant way.
