attache customer anger Adobe said it is working on updates to add details on areas such as AI and content ownership in line with its latest Terms of Service (ToS). blog post. “Your content is yours and will never be used to train generative AI tools,” said Scott Belsky, head of product, and Dana Rao, vice president of legal and policy.
Subscribers of products like Photoshop, Premiere Pro, and Lightroom were outraged by the new, vague language, which they interpreted as meaning Adobe was free to use their work to train the company’s generative AI models. In other words, creators thought Adobe could use AI to effectively copy their work and then resell it.
The other expression was thought to mean that the company might actually have ownership of the user’s copyrighted material. when you see it).
Adobe says none of that is accurate, and points out that the new terms of use are in place for product improvement programs and content moderation, primarily for legal reasons related to CSAM. But many users didn’t see it that way, and Belsky acknowledged that the company “could have been clearer” with the updated ToS.
“In a world where customers worry about how their data is used and how generative AI models are trained, companies that host customer data and content must declare their policies not only publicly, but also through legally binding terms and conditions. Try it.” Belsky said.
To this end, the company has pledged to overhaul its ToS by using “plainer language and examples to help customers understand what’s going on.” [ToS clauses] Meaning and why we have it,” he wrote.
Adobe Updated on June 6th Just a few changes to the same vague language as the original ToS, and no trace of an apology. As the number of subscribers to Creative Cloud services increased, this only seemed to add fuel to the fire. threaten to quit At the same time.
Adobe also claims that it trains its Firefly system only on Adobe Stock images. However, several artists have noted that their names are being used as search terms on Adobe’s stock video site. creative block It has been reported. The result is AI-generated art that sometimes mimics the artist’s style.
The latest post is closer to the truth. It’s my fault With a detailed explanation of what you plan to change. Along with the areas of AI and copyright, the company emphasized that users will be able to opt out of product improvement programs and that licenses will be more “narrowly tailored” to the activities required. He added that it only searches data in the cloud and does not check locally stored content. Lastly, Adobe said it will listen to customer feedback on the new changes.
