Ad image

Arizona refuses to limit governor’s emergency powers

MONews
3 Min Read

Arizonan voted against Proposition No. 135This is a ballot measure that would insert an “emergency declaration amendment” into the Constitution that would limit the governor’s authority to extend emergency declarations to others. 56.8% Seven Arizona voters opposed the proposal, with 68% of the votes counted as of press time.

Two years ago, Governor Doug Ducey signed A similar bill limiting emergency periods to 30-day increments could extend up to 120 days without legislative approval. Proposition 135 sets a hard cap on emergencies at 30 days and prohibits the governor from extending them without approval from state lawmakers. Absent a decision by the state legislature, the declared state of emergency will automatically end after the allotted 30 days.

Under the ballot measure, the 30-day limit would not apply to certain types of emergencies, including war, fire and flood. The Legislature would also have the power to change or limit the governor’s powers when lawmakers declare a state of emergency.

Separate from the amendment’s impact on the emergency declaration, it stipulated that the governor must call a special session upon petition from “at least one-third of each member of the Legislature.” Ballot language. Under current law, two-thirds of lawmakers in both houses must vote in favor of a special session for the governor to convene a special session.

Republican lawmakers hold a majority in both houses Vote in 2023 for the amendment to be on the 2024 ballot; no democrats Voted to include the ballot measure. The bill’s sponsor, State Rep. Joseph Chaplik (R–Scottsdale), cited the additional 700 days of COVID-19 emergency orders as a key reason for supporting the bill. Arizona Republic. Rep. Chaplik said: Arizona Republic This proposition would have allowed a special session to be held immediately after the governor’s “abuse.” [of] Their emergency power.”

Quotes from Opponents of Proposition 135 Concerns about the country’s ability to respond to emergencies. Requiring legislative approval may slow down resources allocated due to the emergency. Allocating state resources, temporary suspensions of regulations, enhanced intelligence gathering, and expedited approval of more stringent public safety measures are all reasons for a state of emergency to be declared.

Organizations such as Arizona Free Enterprise Club and Arizona Libertarian Party While supporting Proposition 135, Arizona Public Health AssociationArizona Working Families Party, Arizona House DemocratsLeague of Women Voters of Arizona, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona I was against it.

noble predictive insight vote Last August, voters appeared to be evenly divided. Among registered voters, 29% said they would vote “yes” on Proposition 135, while 32% said they would vote “no.” But in the end, the bill wasn’t that close and failed by more than 10 points. spare.

Share This Article
Leave a comment