Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ad image

Did Trump blink? | econbrowser

MONews
2 Min Read

I see repeated mention of this claim. like Jason Perman Compared to the announcement of “Day of Liberation,” the increase in tariffs in Chinese products has risen from 54%to 125%even though the tariffs of Chinese products are delayed, and he did not.

I blinked in the sense that President Trump wanted to add additional tariffs on the capricious things. almost.

The following is a picture of an effective tariff when China’s imports to the United States are reduced by half by 125% tariffs.

by the way, USSTR (?) Formula ,,,

I have to say that even stupid people like me should be surprised. It is only natural that no one wants to receive credit/criticism.

Corinth and Beige (AEI) Take a simple taked down of the official problem. Many pointed out that the balance of zero zero is meaningless. I want to go beyond that to say even the total zero balance (in the current account, almost the same as the trade balance). In essence, it is pareto inferior to free trade.

(This equilibrium is the basis of a prosperous US coalition for the “fair exchange rate” in the United States as discussed in this post.)

Finally, I wonder where the CEA is. The role of the CEA was to “kill bad ideas.” And there were many bad ideas around Washington DC as much as I could remember. Perhaps they are fighting a good fight behind the stage. Then it is good for them.

Share This Article
Leave a comment