Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ad image

"Encouraging arguments and not resolving them": Brett Stevens Interview Vanderbilt Chancellor Daniel Diermaier

MONews
3 Min Read

very interesting exchange Sapir Journal, Fall 2024; Here’s a brief summary of the whole thing:

We’ve seen the same data and have been very concerned about the decline in acceptance and trust in higher education. The downward trend is greater among conservative people There is a political spectrum, but it spans both the left and the right. I think it stems from two concerns. On the progressive side, there is concern that universities with high selection rates are perpetuating inequality. And the concern of the right is that we are a woke factory…

The issue of the politicization of higher education has been brought into stark relief after the Middle East conflict and campus drama we witnessed last year. These developments have raised an issue in the public consciousness that has existed for many years. They are now becoming much more serious and many universities are demanding a course correction…

Looking back, there were three pillars to how universities viewed their role in society.

If you look at the University of Chicago, one pillar has been its commitment to free speech. This has been reaffirmed by various chancellors since its founding, most recently in the 2015 report. chicago principles. Universities should be places of public debate.

The second pillar is what we call institutional neutrality. This means that the University does not intervene or take positions on controversial political or social issues that are not directly related to the University’s mission. The University of Chicago formalized this policy. The Kalven Report Since 1967, it has been very persuasive that when a university formulates a party line on an issue, it has the effect of discouraging faculty and students from participating in debate and discourse.

A less appreciated but important third pillar is reasoning, respect, and commitment to argument and the use of evidence. Discourse and debate in universities should not be about shouting. That’s more of a cultural aspect. All three have been eroded, and in a significant way over the past decade. Now we see the results.

post "Encouraging arguments and not resolving them": Bret Stephens Interview Vanderbilt Chancellor Daniel Diermeier appeared first on Reason.com

Share This Article