Forced people often run away in situations where they are impossible. Borders, relocation and worldwide, especially in countries and regions related to ‘North Global’, can infer this insight into abundant scholarship pools, such as Europe. The world’s most deadly sea borderMediterranean. In fact, the Mediterranean has a sad irony that the Mediterranean will be the home of mythological biological creatures and Charybdis, and his myth was inspired by dangerous rocks and dangerous trends, so it was difficult for people to reach a safe shelter through water. “What is between Scylla and Charyebdis” has become a proverb that says, “to be caught between rocks and difficult places.”
Today, Scylla and Charybdis become a reality for those who can move across the border. However, monsters are manifested through hostile politics and policies that cause abandonment, depletion and crime of many people who pursue safety in abundant destinations instead of rocks and current. Such a process can be useful through the concept of. Necrosis It is a kind of governance that increases the vulnerability of early death of those recognized as ‘less’, ‘unwanted’ or ‘unwanted’ developed by Achille MBEMBE. In my study, I develop and track the concept of ‘hostile security’ as a fundamental logic that creates and damages these necrotic landscapes. In this article, I want to briefly show how the logic of hostile security supports the material reality in modern migration governance. crime,,, surveillance,,, lack Early deaths in the context of dangerous sea crossing. To this end, I first introduce hostile security and discuss how it is often interpreted as migrant governance forms and why it is often influenced by scholarships and many criticism and resistance beyond it.
What is ‘hostile security’?
We all have to eat. Is it too obvious? Sometimes the most powerful analysis and insights come from the obvious observation. Feminist analysis Social reproduction Example this. In my studies, I think that social reproduction is controversial about what we are safe and safe for our interdependent life -food, nursing or shelter -I am safe and safe. We cannot stop these demands and certainly cannot be serious. This means I am thinking about security AS and Thure Social reproduction.
The biggest problem with social reproduction is how to organize it. Therefore, it is a primitive issue of policy and (global) political economy. also It suggests the problem of capitalism in the leading form of the latter world. What kind of ‘security project’ is capitalism? In other words, what is the characteristic of the life or social reproduction of the capitalist organization?
In my study, I found that scholars who think about the raciality of capitalism provide an important reference point. In one case, they are interested in understanding the material process that specializes in capitalist organizations. But they are logic, letters with scholars such as Stewart Hall and Sylvia Wynter, A family with no doubt and Origin It creates and makes these processes and vice versa. This scholarship explains how race composition comes to mind to encode the difference between human beings. Or think that you can be someone Less than humansMaterial reality and strong ideas Conquest, war,,, Colonialism and slavery In the context of emerging as capitalism.
What you can learn from feminists and decomfort scholars is to exploit peopleEd And the subjectEd In different forms of structural violence, they must first be used.Canable And the subjectCanable. Thus, in my interpretation, the study of raciality of capitalism is therefore a way to study inhumanization and that is related to the violent logic and material of capitalism as a global political economy. like Ruth Wilson Gilmore put it in: “Capitalism requires inequality […] As we develop, change, and rebel under capitalism in the world’s entire social order, we continue to see the demands of inequality through racism. ”
From this scholarship, we can conclude that capitalism is a security project (form of social reproduction organization). Hostile One: It suggests that social reproductive conditions can be ‘security’ and needed by sacrificing certain people recognized (through racial discrimination/inhumanization). ‘different’ With a modern understanding of ‘human’. On the perception of capitalism, ‘human’ and ‘others’ are willing to be a theoretical existence and fall into each other’s antagonism. Through the composition of race, but with olúfẹmi O. táíwò In the concept of hostile security “We explain extensively through all social layers that can use people who are qualified and qualified.
Specifically, this hostile relationship is guilty of ‘others’ guilty until it is proven to be innocent or until ‘others’ prove their ‘qualifications’. What exactly is it? Accurate claims of justifiable claims to secure access to social reproductive conditions; Accounting safety and dignity life. Concept and logic Therefore, ‘value’ maintains other human/other antagonism. And shows the crisis. In the UK, you can often see this story in discussion. migration (Including asylum) and welfareFor example, in the panic of the fear of being judged, ‘unwanted’, that is, ‘Bogus’ and ‘fraud’ “Amazing surge […] As a private asset ” A 10 years of tightening.
From above, we have hostile security, its participation in its estimates and tasks, beyond the forced displacement, a wide range of investigations on the state and border, their functions, inclusions and exclusion methods, as well as The meaning of the colonial world In the latter. Approaching security research from the feminist perspective I introduce can be useful for identifying these interconnections. It helps to gain a deeper understanding of why many people can find a difficult place to find a better life and a difficult place.
Learning in interviews and dialogue with people who know the sharp end of the British migration and welfare of the British migration and welfare means that life is difficult or impossible to be difficult or impossible. Eternal crisis. Healthy security appears as a permanent crisis of everyday life, which is responsible for proving its ‘value’ according to its logic. I now investigate the concrete fabric of this crisis and create a connection between hostile security and harmful materials in migration governance.
Necrosis
In my study, I trace the work of antagonistic security in the four deep interconnected levels described above, the logic (or ‘cosmology’), which is described above, and finally fulfills it in the body before forming a political economy and daily life within its political economy.
At the political economy including the latter Legal productionThe strict and restrained migration governance of the migration has been strengthened after the war with the world terrorism Bean sprouts Capitalism and colonialism. This accompanies the same process as outside. Outsourcing Or inside deputy It is related to the argument of boundaries and security access and Life (Social reproduction) ~ The claim of value is difficult or impossible for those who are easy to break, suspect or already confiscated. This process Activation and fuel exploitation When the reception is terminated.
Daily life or social reproduction becomes difficult or impossible in the context of the logic of ‘value’, the product of antagonistic security. In the UK, this logic has been violent in the daily life of many people in the form of tightening and increasingly hostile immigration politics over the past decade. Approach food Is it safe? Access to a safe and appropriate person house Is it safe? On the view The remaining indefinite vacation? to Disability support? to Correct health care? Safe lack? These are only a few threads in the complex fabrics of everyday life, and essentially, the ‘value’ problem is tied to the problem of life and the death of life. at last, “[i]If you can’t get access to houses, foods, or water, it doesn’t seem to be worse, but Will die faster. ”
The above means that depletion The process of material moving by hostile security logic is not interrupted in everyday life, but it attempts to crawl under the skin to achieve the body in a poor health or early death. This does not mean that it interferes with competition, resistance and knowledge that show their work. The controversial room is that the logic of hostile security is interpreted as a material process of hostility, neglect and abandonment of those who are already vulnerable through alienation.
conclusion
In this article, I provided insight into my thoughts on hostile security, and today I maped them to a welfare and border, insisting on the association between necrotic logic and process at work at work. The above process can affect people of all racial identity, but their logic is related to the function of capitalism and colonial organization, as well as racial and racism. Scholarships that participate in the scholarship of feminist security and feminist political economies, as well as scholarships of capitalism, are well -equipped with equipment that can understand hostile concepts and security practices and how to form the present world and people’s lives.
Finally, many of us benefit from the above cosmic theory and the political economy, enjoying everyday life satisfaction and health, and up to diverse degrees. Many people can live comfortably. Otherwise, hostile security will not prevail at first. The question still remains about this background. Can damages over? Or is our social reproduction and the ability to think and feel the world around us are already too suitable for antagonism? Scylla and Charybdis are probably ‘yes’.
Additional reading of electronic international relations
