Mandan, North Dakota- Ten years after the world’s indigenous demonstrations in Dakota Access Pipeline, representatives of Greenpeace International (GPI) arrived at the Morton County Court and arrived at the Morton County Court to fight the contributions raised by Energy Transfer (ET) I did it. ), today.
The trial is currently open to the public in the North Dakota court. Various attempts to petition into the court for the greater transparency and accessibility to the trial procedure have been rejected. Greenpeace Parties’ public live streaming requests have been rejected, and recently, many outlets and journalists have been rejected.
Dakota Access Pipeline -based fossil fuel pipeline companies behind the world can suffer US $ 300 million in one of the world’s most shameless cases against strategic lawsuits against spread. ET’s lawsuits attempt to rebuild the history of indigenous protests in Standing Rock and can have a cold effect on the United States and other free media. Since 2017, the US GPI and Greenpeace organizations have been defending ET’s lawsuits.[1]Greenpeace says the protests have been coordinated.
Deepa Padmanabha, the chief legal adviser of Greenpeace USA, said: “This lawsuit goes beyond the impact on green pieces, and one of the most worried things about this case is that it can establish a dangerous new legal precedent for protests in protests. And you can imagine that this will have a serious cold effect on someone who wants to participate in the protest. ”
Kristin Casper, a legal advisor of Greenpeace International, said:We are convinced that the Greenpeace International will ultimately prevail with the US co -defendants. We will defend the Greenpeace International in the trial, and we will also pursue efforts to restore the costs of ET’s slapp litigation in the United States through legal procedures in the Netherlands. We are grateful for the support from all over the world because we win when the exercise acts together. ”
The GPI began the first test of the European Union’s anti -slab guidelines by filing a lawsuit against the Dutch court for ET early this month. The GPI tries to recover the continuous damage and cost of ET.[2]
A lawsuit before energy is a clear example of Slaps.[3] ET’s lawsuits were attempts to bury non -profit organizations and sportsmen in legal costs, pushed them with bankruptcy and ultimately silent.
end
reference :
1. The first lawsuit of ET was filed in the federal court under the RICO law. Racketeer was raised by the Federal Law, which was designed to prosecute mob activities, and was raised by the corrupt organizational law. The judge has fallen “much shorter” evidence of what evidence needs to establish a RICO company. Since the Federal Court did not decide to defamate or request a conspiracy, ET quickly submitted a new case with the claims of Lee and other state laws.
2. https://www.greenpeace.org/international Ional-Files-Lawsuit-AGAINST-ENESFER-in-FIRST-UNTI-SLAPP-DIPLECTION/
3. A Documented European SLAPPS In 2010-2023, 1049 slaps suits in Europe, 166 lawsuits in 2023. Big Oil Companies Shell, TOTAL and ENI have submitted a slap to Greenpeace Entities in recent years, and attempts to attempt to end up with a embarrassing ending to shell and total.
contact lens:
Laura Bergamo, Greenpeace canada communication activist
[email protected] ; +1 438 928-5237
Greenpeace International Press Desk, +31 (0) 20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), [email protected]
Sign up GREENPEACE SLAPP Trial WhatsApp Group For the latest update
