Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ad image

Jack Smith moves to dismiss 1/6 of charges against Trump

MONews
3 Min Read

Special Prosecutor Jack Smith dismissed the case against Trump because of the Justice Department’s policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.

From Smith’s papers:
As a result of the election held on November 5, 2024, defendant Donald J. Trump is scheduled to be inaugurated as president on January 20, 2025. It has long been the Department of Justice’s position that the U.S. Constitution prohibits federal prosecution and subsequent criminal prosecution of a sitting president. But the Justice Department and the nation have never faced a situation where a federal indictment against a civilian was returned by a grand jury and a criminal indictment was already in progress when the defendant was elected president.

Faced with these unprecedented circumstances, the Office of the Special Counsel consulted with the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), whose interpretation of constitutional issues such as those raised herein is binding on Department of Justice prosecutors. After careful consideration, the Department has determined that the OLC’s previous opinion regarding the Constitution’s prohibition on federal prosecution and prosecution of a sitting President applies to this situation and, as a result, this indictment should be dismissed before the defendant takes office.

This is an expected result. Trump is an example of how money and political power can affect the justice system. All the lawyers on cable news and social media proclaiming that the rule of law will take care of Trump and that justice will be served are 100% wrong.

Their belief in the rule of law was religious and misguided.

The rule of law depends on money and power, and court cases against Trump were bound to die down as soon as it became clear that he would be the nominee. When the Republican Party ignored the rule of law, it opened the door for Trump to skate over all charges, and now that the president essentially has full immunity, this country will never find itself in a situation like this again.

Trump not only ignored it, he changed presidential immunity forever.

Jason Easley
Latest posts from Jason Easley (See all)
Share This Article