Jamie Carragher did not agree with the latest suggestion of the Ian Wright, which handles FSG’s Liverpool contract.
Trent Alexander-Arnold is the first of the so-called “contract rebels” who left Anfield in the upcoming summer window.
This is based on the development of dialogue with the UK before the current terms of Real Madrid expired in June.
The principle of the transaction is understood to be fixed by local tax laws set as the next major obstacle.
Jamie Carragher did not agree with the Ian Wright in FSG
Carragher had nothing when Wright suggested that the FSG was responsible for the contract to run in the last year.
“It’s related to Jamie, FSG, so it’s related to the FSG about where you arrived because they had to think.” Former Arsenal Star I talked about the overlap of Sky Bet.
“No, no, no” Carragher responded.
Wright continued to add: “Three players? I have never seen it…
Gary Neville seemed surprising to explain the situation of the SKY SPORTS colleague’s expiration contract between Virgil Van Dijk and Co..
Who is the responsibility for the exit of Trent Alexander-Arnold?
We must agree with Carragher. It will be fired to the commentator to overlook the fact that large shaking on the back of the stage has contributed to the present concern.
Even the bombing of Jurgen Klopp’s outlets in the mid -season, we were also in the process of classifying new sports directors and recruitment teams behind the scenes.
When the contracts of Van Dijk, Alexander-Arnold and Mo Salah were still priority, was there more important than replacing all German tactics?
Foundation has been presented for the long -term future of Liverpool Football Club.
It does not think that we should not be the 4th and 11th contracts.
On the contrary, if we support the concept that it is financially feasible and data will continue to have a positive impact on the side, we will all be.
Please join the reader channel in WhatsApp To get the best story of the day directly to mobile
