Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ad image

Large Corporations in Korea’s Miracle of Growth

MONews
1 Min Read

We quantify the contribution of the largest firms to Korea’s economic performance over the period 1972–2011. Using firm-level historical data, we document a novel finding: Firm concentration increased substantially during the growth miracle. To understand whether increasing concentration contributed positively or negatively to Korea’s real income, we construct a quantitative heterogeneous firm small-open economy model. Our framework accommodates a variety of potential causes and consequences of changes in firm concentration: productivity, distortions, export selection, scale economies, and oligopolistic and oligopolistic market power in domestic product and labor markets. The model is implemented directly in firm-level data and inverted to recover the dynamics of concentration. We find that most of the differential performance of top firms is due to higher productivity growth rather than differential distortions. The superior performance of the top three firms in each sector relative to the average firm contributed 15 percent to real GDP in 2011 and 4 percent to the net present value of welfare over the period 1972–2011. So, Korea’s big companies were superstars rather than supervillains.

It is from New NBER Working Paper The authors are Jaedo Choi, Andrei A. Levchenko, Dimitrije Ruzic, and Younghun Shim.


Share This Article