Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ad image

License racket

MONews
3 Min Read

I review A very good new book about job licenses, License racket REBECCA HAW Allensworth of WSJ.

Most people will admit that licenses for hair brands and interior decorators are excessive, while licenses for doctors, nurses and lawyers are essential. Hair brands have little threats to public safety, but sub -doctors, nurses and lawyers can ruin their lives. She asks for evidence from allensworth’s credit. Do job licenses protect consumers? The author focuses on the forgotten job license agency.

The government enacts the Job License Act, but does not directly handle regulations. Instead, interpretation and execution are generally delegated to a license board dominated by members of the job. Job license is its own regulation. The result is predictable. It is led by the board of directors, professional identity and culture, and this board continues to prefer its members over consumers.

Allensworth spent hundreds of hours at the board meeting by conducting a thorough research on the “license racket”. Tennessee Alarm-Most of the complaints from the board of directors of system contract companies occur from consumers reporting the types of problems prevented by licenses: bad installation, cord violation, high pressure sales tactics and exploitation of the elderly. However, the board of directors dismisses most of the complaints about its own members and sometimes more aggressively disciplines the unlicensed handman, which sometimes installs an alarm system. Allensworth said, “The board of directors is more likely to take 10 times more measures if the board insists on unlicensed practice rather than complaining about service quality or safety.”

She finds similar patterns among boards that control the auctioneers, hairdressers and barber. Enforcement efforts tend to protect the grass more than consumers. Consumers are interested in bad services, not who are licensed, so guess who complains about unmanned practitioners. A practitioner with a license. According to Allensworth, the board was the case that the competitor began, “It’s not a consumer complaint that claims fraud, looting tactics and transplantation.”

We hope that the board that supervise the nurse and the doctor will be able to prioritize the patient’s safety. But the findings of allensworth show that they are not. She stole sex for prescriptions, operates a pill factory, assaults a patient in anesthesia, and ignores serious illegal acts, including nurses and doctors who operate while drunken. Record it.

Read all.

The license racket post was first in the limit revolution.

TAGGED:
Share This Article