Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ad image

Prosthetics that can control the mind have become possible through muscle implants. No brain surgery required.

MONews
3 Min Read

Alex Smith He was 11 years old when he lost his right arm in 2003. A drunk driver driving a boat crashed into a family’s boat on Lake Austin, sending him overboard. He was hit by a propeller and his arm fell into the water.

A year later, he received a myoelectric arm, a type of prosthesis powered by electrical signals from the residual limb muscles. However, Smith rarely used it because it was “very, very slow” and had limited range of motion. He could open and close his hands, but couldn’t do much else. He’s tried other robotic arms over the years but had similar problems.

“They’re just not very functional,” he says. “There is a huge delay between executing a function and then having the prosthesis actually perform that function. It’s faster to find different ways to do things in everyday life.”

Recently, he’s been testing a new system from Phantom Neuro, an Austin-based startup, that could provide more realistic control of prosthetic limbs. The company is creating thin, flexible muscle implants that allow amputees a wider, more natural range of motion simply by thinking about what they want to do.

“Not many people use robotic limbs because the control systems are so poor,” says Connor Glass, CEO and co-founder of Phantom Neuro.

In data shared exclusively with WIRED, 10 participants in a study conducted by Phantom used a wearable version of the company’s sensors to control a robotic arm already on the market, achieving an average accuracy of 93.8% across 11 hand and wrist gestures. I did it. Smith was one of the participants, and the other nine were healthy volunteers, a common occurrence in early prosthetics research. The success of this research paves the way for future testing of Phantom’s implantable sensors.

Current myopotential prostheses, like the one Smith attempted, read electrical impulses from surface electrodes placed on the amputated stump. Most robotic prostheses have two electrodes or recording channels. When a person bends their hand, the arm muscles contract. These muscle contractions still occur when upper limb amputees bend. The electrodes pick up the electrical signals from the contraction, interpret them, and initiate movement of the prosthesis. However, surface electrodes do not always capture stable signals because they can slip or move, which reduces accuracy in real-world environments.

Share This Article