Here is Financial time:
Donald Trump ordered the Ministry of Justice to suspend the US anti -corruption law, which prohibits Americans to bribe foreign officials to win business.
It was so in the past Multiple Post The United States argues that companies should prohibit money to those who are engaged in “ransomware” and prohibit a long detention term for violations. I argued that this kind of regulation would actually help business. In the opinion section, there were many opposition to my claim. But no one provided Good reason Why am I wrong, just argued that it’s not damaged.
You will not assume that you usually prefer regulations that limit the way you can act. But the FT article provides evidence that I am correct.
The decision was criticized by anti -corruption experts who said that if the law would be suspended, it would harm a US company operating abroad.
“Maximum [US] The company is grateful that the FCPA can reject bribery. .
The same claim is also applied to ransomware attacks. Given the choice, I will allow overseas bribery more than domestic bribery. But I am not sure which type of bribery is our best.
In related notes Ken White President Trump and Elon Musk have reported that they are using a lawsuit against organizations that criticize them.
Trump, who had long preferred fake lawsuits as a weapon for enemies, was in censorship vendors. Last year he is as follows: The polls were sued Bad survey results; CBS Perhaps he edits Kamala Harris interviews to make her look better. and ABC and George Stephanopoulos E. Interfere with Jean Carroll’s explanation of sexual abuse. Meanwhile, Musk sued both media problems and two Center for digital hatred Report on hatred in X. . .
Trump’s elections led to cascades with powerful media companies that resolve ambiguous Trump litigation. This is Facebook Pay $ 25 million In order to solve Trump’s claim that social media sites have violated the first amendment rights by mediating him, another claim is. nonsense. alphabet I paid $ 15 million To solve Trump’s claim. The incident had more advantages, but ABC’s sudden surrender is a problem. It interferes with concessions rather than fighting for the first amendment, but Trump is not an ordinary manuscript.
These corporate payments are not bribes in the legal sense, but they are clearly made to give favor to important government policy makers. White reported that California passed the law to protect people from such a frivolous lawsuit.
Slapp is an abbreviation for strategic litigation against the public’s participation, and its purpose is not to solve true mistakes, but to suppress expressions of public issues. In the early 1990s, California lawyers found that real estate developers faced the environment and neighboring protests against new developments and sued protesters. The lawsuit lacked the advantages, but because our civil justice system was broken, they were successful suppression. California passing The first anti-slaff law-the state law that provides a special remedy to the accused when someone sues in a speech. According to California’s anti -law, if the defendant can show the plaintiff that the plaintiff is suing them, the plaintiff should provide an unknown evidence that the plaintiff can overcome the case. If they can’t do it, the judge will dismiss the case and the plaintiff must pay the defendant’s lawyer. It’s a game changer.
