Kelly Pickler and my deceased husband’s parents. Kyle Jacobs is entangled in legal disagreements over Jacobs’ estate.
Both parties are heading to court after Pickler, 38, filed an appeal. reed and Sharon JacobsAccording to the co-manager of Kyle’s estate: in touch, Who was the first to spread the news?
Kyle committed suicide on February 17, 2023. He and Pickler began dating in 2008 and have been married since 2011.
“A dispute arose between the parties regarding certain personal property. [Kyle’s] The petition titled “Possession before death” was submitted on August 16. our week.
I love you like a love song. Kellie Pickler and husband Kyle Jacobs bonded over their musical backgrounds, but decided to take some time before getting married. The American Idol contestant met her future husband through a friend in the mid-2000s. The two were playing Earth Weekly’s ‘Honeymoon Game’ in December 2015. […]
The petition alleges that Reed and Sharon produced a document titled an “asset inventory” demanding that Pickler turn over certain items via subpoena. Some of them she claims she doesn’t have or that ownership is in dispute.
Among the items they requested was Kyle’s firearms collection, which reportedly consisted of three rifles, seven pistols, a shotgun, a silencer and a gun safe. His parents are also asking for his watches and jewelry, baseball card collection, musical instruments and personal devices.
Kyle’s parents also reportedly took items from Pickler’s home without telling him.
“As part of this action, Mr. Pickler is seeking an order requiring the Joint Administrator to identify items obtained from his home,” the petition reads.
Meanwhile, Reed and Sharon are disputing Pickler’s claims that he didn’t know where some of the requested items were or that he didn’t have the rights to them. They admitted entering Pickler’s home to retrieve certain items; our week“At the express invitation of,” it claims. [Pickler] and her attorney who met to discuss the transfer of items belonging to the estate.”
The petition also states that Pickler knew what items to take because he had set them aside specifically for Kyle’s parents.
Reed and Sharon are requesting that Pickler’s petition be dismissed because the couple has gone through a prenuptial process outlining future ownership of Kyle’s property.
Pickler later obtained a protective order prohibiting either party from sharing any recordings or videos of his testimony to avoid “annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense.”
Kyle’s parents are opposing the order, claiming it “seeks to protect information/documents that do not yet exist.” ‘I’m embarrassed’ [Pickler’s] Suggested orders will be added free of charge.”
Reed and Sharon filed their objections on November 7, and the lawsuit remains ongoing.
