Ukraine’s leadership has created an opposition to the Trump administration plan, which is criticized for acknowledging too much in Russia. The opposing defendant digs some of the initial demands of KYIV, but suggests possible concessions on problems that are difficult to deal with for a long time.
Depending on this plan obtained by the New York Times, there will be no restrictions on the size of the Ukrainian army. The “European Security Heard” supported by the United States will be deployed to ensure security in Ukrainian territory, and Russian Russian assets will be used to repair Ukrainian damage during the war.
These three provisions can be the boss of the Kremlin, but some of the Ukrainian plans suggest that they find something in common. For example, there is no mention of Ukraine, which completely reclaims all the territory that Russia seizes, or there is no complete claim to Ukraine, where Ukraine joined NATO. There are two problems that President VolodyMyr Zelensky is not about negotiations for a long time.
President Trump flew to Rome on Friday and attended the Pope Francis funeral on Saturday. Zelen Ski also planned, but his spokesman said that it depends on the situation of Ukraine on Friday. This week, Russia has been injured by dozens of Russian attacks on the capital, KYIV.
Trump landed in Rome and then Russia and Ukraine urged both sides to “finish” in a social media post. At the beginning of that day, he said that he and Zelen Ski could meet in the funeral side job. Under the anonymous conditions, Ukrainian senior officials told him that when Mr. Zelen Ski went to Rome, President Trump would personally present Ukraine’s opposition.
Prime Minister Zellenski said on Friday that he was criticized and optimistic compared to the tone of the previous statement this week.
When President Trump and JD Vance vice president replaced President Ukraine in an elliptical office, he would be the first meeting between the two leaders since Zelen Ski visited the White House in February.
In addition, a few days over a few days of the outline of peace negotiations with Russia for several days between the White House and Ukrainian leadership.
Zelen Ski rejected the White House proposal that refused to propose the White House this week. This week, the United States unveiled Crimean’s control over Russia’s control over the Crimean Peninsula, which was illegally merged in 2014.
Despite the Rancor, there is still room for concessions between Washington and Keyev, but their position is hardly set.
It is unclear that you can accept Moscow.
Ukraine’s latest suggestions should be guaranteed, for example, Ukrainian NATO (strongly opposite by Moscow), but Zelensky has long had a long -holded position. Instead, “Ukraine’s joining for NATO depends on the agreement between members of the allies.”
In a dialogue in London and Paris, US officials repeatedly intended to oppose Trump’s NATO member countries, but told Ukraine that they would not detain the future president if they had a different position.
According to a Paris meeting last week, “the next US administration can decide to take Ukraine to NATO,” the Americans told the Ukrainians. US officials said Ukraine understood that he would not accept any restrictions on joining NATO.
And the White House took the side of Ukraine, not Russia, regarding the future form of the Ukrainian army. Kremlin demanded that in addition to Russia itself, Ukrainian army, the largest and largest battlefield in Europe, would be strictly limited to scale and ability. Trump administrative officials told the Ukrainians that they would not support such restrictions.
And President Trump and Vance were ready to admit Russian sovereignty over Crimia this week, but Americans did not repeatedly stated that KYIV would not demand so much for Ukrainians, and did not expect Europeans to follow the lead of the United States.
Nevertheless, Trump’s contract claimed that “we are very close,” but there is a long way to go. All aspects agree that the Russians and Ukrainians should stop shooting before serious peace negotiations, but the ceasefire seems ambiguous at any time.
A few hours after President Trump disciplined Zelensky for not supporting the White House peace proposal this week, Russia began an attack on KYIV, killing at least 12 people and injuring 90 others. The attack caused Trump’s rare rebuke, but similar attacks minimized the US’s reaction, including killing 34 years of age, including a hit of Dongbu City SUMY on Sunday.
Russia was demanded by the Trump administration, and Ukraine refused to truce 30 days. President Putin did not maintain even a daily truce proposed in the Mark Easter, and both sides accused the other to fight the other side.
Then there is a territory problem.
After Putin’s invasion in February 2022, the Russian army occupied a large portion of Ukrainian territory and occupied the south of the East, as well as the eastern Dobas region, as well as the land of Russian territory with Crimia. Kremlin did not give up one of the territory, including much of the four Ukrainians declared by President Putin.
The Ukrainians say that their suggestions do not specify their meaning, but they must be “completely restored”. Zelen Ski said his ultimate goal of his executive for a long time was that in 1991, when he declared independence from the Soviet Union, including Crimia.
All Ukrainian proposals said, “The territory problem can be discussed after a complete and unconditional ceasefire.”
Trump administrative officials described the unrealistic Zelensky Russian army with the goal of pushing out all of these occupation territory. The US proposal will actually accept Russia’s control over this occupation area. Ukraine and European partners say they are compensated for Russia’s invasion.
This would be a painful concession to the Ukrainians, but the Trump administration has rejected all Russian territory demands. For example, the White House refused to go with Russia’s request to leave Ukraine’s retreat from the four Ukrainian states that President Putin declared as part of Russia.
One participant who participated in the talks said the White House’s position was “an unfair and irreversible demand that would not be supported.”
This week, Vance said that if both sides did not agree with the “freeze” on the territory route, the United States would be far from the dialogue.
US officials later said that the total territory of Russia’s control is unlikely to change in future negotiations, but Ukrainian officials tried to propose territorial swaps to improve their defense. Trump administrative officials have personally guaranteed to fight for the Ukrainians, but they can’t guarantee that Russia will go with them.
