Stockholm, Sweden, March 14 (IPS) -In this intense and sad period, it is difficult to quietly about the abuse and human rights violations of human rights that arise around the world. Eastern DR Congo, South Sudan, Ukraine and Gaza. One of the most serious examples of unhealthy positions of such abuse is the behavior of the Trump administration, especially the president’s behavior against Ukrainian President Ukraine. Trump’s suspicion is a doubt about the feasibility of the nation’s desperate struggle against the dictatorship, aiming to destroy the country and take over the richest territory.
A position that can be considered in relation to the bold declaration of “the world’s greatest democracy.” Faith, which has been rooted in most of the firm American citizens, believes that this democracy is guaranteed by the constitutional constitution.
Former President Joseph (Joseph) was among these believers and thought that his faith began to shake.
We are still democracy at our core. But history says that democracy is fatal for blind loyalty to single leaders and willingness to participate in political violence. For a long time we told ourselves that American democracy was guaranteed, but it is not. We must defend it, protect, and stand up.
Nevertheless, is it worth it to ask if the US Constitution can actually defend democracy and human rights, defending US democracy and trying to oppose the current president’s dictatorship?
honor FatherA person who assembled the Constitution in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 (1789) assumed that the United States could not be pure democracy. The controversial problem in this revolutionary era had to be democratic and still remains today.
At that time, the president, the Senate and the judiciary would be elected rather than the people. only House of Representatives It will be elected directly, but the people who can vote were “property -owned adults, white men.” But one important feature of the Constitution was that it could be “modified” and more democratic characteristics over the years. In the second century after ratification of the Constitution, the original document was originally “modified”.
For example, when the 14th amendment was given citizenship to everyone who was “born in the United States”, including those who were previously slaves, they became more democratized in 1868. The amendment provided all citizens with “equal protection according to the law.” In 1870, the 15th amendment established that the race could not be rejected by race. In 1913, the 17th amendment gave voters the right to choose a senator rather than the State Council, and in 1920, the 19th amendment gave women the right to vote. The 18th of the establishment of an alcoholic ban was abolished by the United States.
The proposed amendment must be ratified by the legislative department of the week after two -thirds of the parliamentary passed. The same rules are applied to removal of the amendment. However, there are several legal deceptions that can be used to avoid the Constitutional Amendment. Famously US Supreme Court In 1883, the southern nations allowed them to ratify racial discrimination and discrimination laws by declaring that the 14th and 15th amendments only dealt with discrimination, not individuals. Non -abalone ruling, Civil rights law 1964 and A Voting correct act 1965.
Until then, some state laws have denied native Americans, Asians and others in humans and voting rights. This is only an example of how to ignore the US Constitution through legal chickens. Supreme CourtThe objectivity of the political alliance was interrupted by political alliance.
Since his inauguration, Trump’s view of the presidential authorities seems to be much less limited than his predecessors. He is trying to restrict the citizenship of birth, to withhold the right funds, to remove the heads of the independent federal agencies, and to personally try to interfere with the lawsuit against him. It seems as if the current US president believes in the Supreme Court, which will not interfere with irregular ventures using the Constitution.
The first amendment to the US Constitution Relay It was ratified in 1791. The first amendment was read
Congress should not propose a law on religion or prohibit free movement. Or summarizes freedom of the press or the press; Or people’s rights have the right to petition to the government to assemble and resolve complaints peacefully.
Recently questioned by the administration or the right to be “mediated”. Trump threatened and sued his critics for decades, referring to many journalists as “enemy enemies,” and sued CNN, ABC News, CBS News and Publisher Simon & Schuster.
After Trump’s rise to the president’s position, such actions became today’s order. The White House media team recently decided to decide someone who could access the press conference, and prohibit global news agencies. Reuters and AP communication (AP). The announcement continued one day after the Trump administration made a temporary ruling. It is possible to prohibit AP to retaliation for the outlet’s decision to resist Trump’s demand to change Mexico’s own name to “US Bay.”
On March 4, President Trump’s attempt at the infringement of the “media speech” was to stop all the federal funds for universities and schools that allow “illegal” demonstrations, and “stirrers” were imprisoned or returned to all countries, or “American students will be expelled or arrested permanently depending on crime.”
Meanwhile, Elon Musk motivated politically. Government efficiency (DOGE) We are already planning to close CFPB, a federal regulator that enforces the Financial Consumer Protection Act. US International Development Institution (UASAID) and Ministry of Education. Doge also announced a bold dismissal. Federal Aviation BureauMusk’s fine in September 2024 SpacexIt is over $ 600,000 for not following the license requirements for two rocket launches.
Doge so far Federal Emergency Management Agency and revenueWhile proposing to greatly limit funding Medicare,yes National Institute of Health,, National Maritime Atmospheric Managementexchequer.
Job seekers who want to join the Trump administration are facing a series of loyalty tests. The White House review team fought against government agencies, confirmed “American Make Great Again,” and carefully checked the applicant’s social media posts. Candidates are asked about the results of the 2020 elections and the parliamentary attack on January 6, 2021. Trump is two problems that I think of loyalty.
Joseph (Joe) MCCARTHY, who went on the road for the Republican in the early 1950s State Department And in other places in the federal facility, there are 205 communists in the State Department as “a member who converts cards.” McCarthy pressed the list.
The media’s interest was that McCarthy’s arguments exploded, and he soon became the thorns of President Harry Truman Democratic President. Even if McCarthy did not find a communist who played an important role, he and his allies destroyed the reputation of thousands of civil servants, scholars and journalists. Some have not recovered professionally, and some have even committed suicide. First of all, many Republicans did not oppose McCarthy and his lies. Senator Margaret Chase Smith declared:
It will surely end that we all cherish in the way of life in the United States, if we all stop becoming the tools and victims of totalitarian skills.
Many Republicans wanted to regain power. McCarthy and his accusations assumed that they were important for the election victory. But the Republican 1952 presidential candidate and war hero Dwight Eisenhower did not need McCarthy’s lies to gain popularity. Nevertheless, after his victory, Eisenhower granted MCCARTHY a chairman of the major Senate Subcommittee to open a way for his power, reputation and false height. McCarthy’s Crusaders were two years later Department of Defense Through the promotion of the left army dentist. Regarding this problem, TVDebate exposed McCarthy to a compulsive lie, making him withdraw from the public view. He died three years later at the age of 48.
Recent movies, cubFor many years, Donald J. Trump’s legal advisors, personal friends and promoters have shown some light on the role of the legendary lawyer Roy Cohn. Roy Cohn began his career as an influential investigator of the McCarthy Subsub. Trump often talked about Cohn as a lawyer, and taught him, teaching him, teaching him, teaching worrying about victory.
What kind of opposition will Trump’s obvious abuse of the Constitution arouses in his party? Why aren’t many people who confess the belief in the omnipotence of the Democratic Party and the Constitution recognize the president as the president’s threat? The fate of the United States not only depends on this, but also depends on the fate of many other places unless it is the world.
IPS Un Bureau
Follow @IPSNEWSUNBUREAU
Follow IPS NEWS un Bureau in Instagram
© Inter Press Service (2025) -Lee all rights. Source: Inter Press Service
