Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ad image

Walz’s Minnesota ranked last among the 50 states in fiscal policy.

MONews
3 Min Read

Credit: Lorie Shaull, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

All 50 states were ranked, with Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds first and Democratic vice presidential candidate and Minnesota Gov. Tim Waltz last, according to a newly released fiscal policy analysis.

The liberal Cato Institute announced: reportWe ranked states based on spending, revenue, and taxes. The top 10 states are Iowa, Nebraska, West Virginia, Arkansas, South Dakota, Montana, Hawaii, Georgia, Idaho, and Vermont.

According to the analysis, the bottom 10 states are New Mexico, Missouri, Oregon, Michigan, Wisconsin, Delaware, Washington, Maine, New York, and finally Minnesota.

The bottom six states received an ‘F’ grade.

RELATED: Rapper Lord Jamar says black men like him won’t be ‘ashamed’ for voting for Kamala: ‘She doesn’t deserve to run Dunkin Donuts’

Walz’s low rating comes just three weeks before the presidential election in a race in which he and his running mate, Vice President Kamala Harris, are nearly tied with former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio.

The report explains the reasons for Walz’s low score, noting a series of tax increases under his leadership and a 36% increase in spending since 2022, from about $52 billion to nearly $71 billion.

From the report:

For 2019, Walz’s budget would ‘add $2 billion more in new spending and increase taxes by $1.3 billion to pay for it, with the remaining funds coming from existing surpluses.’ But he compromised with the legislature, and the final tax increase amounted to about $330 million per year. Walz also pushed for higher gas taxes and higher vehicle fares to raise about $1 billion a year in transportation costs, but those increases were rejected.

Walz has pushed for more tax increases in 2021. He proposed adding a new personal income tax rate of 10.85%, higher than the current top rate of 9.85%, adding a surtax on capital gains and dividends and raising the corporate tax rate from 9.8% to 9.8%. 11.25 percent. The proposal, which would have raised about $1.6 billion a year, was rejected by the Legislature.

Walz targeted the middle class with HF 2887, which increased taxes and fees on vehicles and transportation. The increases included indexing gasoline taxes for inflation, increasing vehicle registration taxes, increasing delivery fees and increasing sales taxes in the Twin Cities area.

Syndicated with permission in the central square.

While supporting Trump, the Border Patrol coalition opposes Biden, Harris argues.

Share This Article