Critical terrorism studies (CTS) has become an increasingly prominent and important fixture in contemporary debates about political violence. In my opinion, that contribution was particularly important. It encourages us to think more carefully about the nature of terrorism and the purposes of terrorism studies.. CTS’ accomplishments include (among many other things) documentation. How is ‘terrorism’ constituted? on various sites official and ‘everyday’ discourse; chart Genealogy of modern understanding of terrorism; Forces attention to traditionally ignored forms of terrorist violence (Generally conducted by the state); It shows that the dominant understanding of terrorism is inherently political. gender specific and Racism erection; Encourages closer analysis. Threats from non-state terrorism This is generally Presented to the public through exceptionalist language.; And obey Ongoing criticism of widespread counterterrorism practices and violence. Moreover, much of the early work in this field utilized discursive techniques to analyze content. Stories of terrorism by privileged actorsAnalysis of CTS Concentrate upon and Methodological toolkit Both have expanded dramatically over the past two decades, as evidenced by recent important research. collection.
in new article published in journal Critical Study of Terrorism – I’d like to look at some of the key ways in which CTS has evolved over the past 20 years. There were two reasons why I did that. First, I wanted to highlight the pluralism that exists in this field and demonstrate, or argue, that CTS is a much broader entity than is sometimes assumed. The contributors to this work all share an interest in critically approaching (counter)terrorism, but do not (necessarily) share an understanding of terrorism itself or of terrorism in practice. What does it mean to be critical?! In my view, CTS embodies a diverse and growing set of political commitments, conceptual frameworks, and methodological tools. And while pluralism has its downsides, this heterogeneity is one of the reasons why CTS has remained relevant even in the face of: familiar (Sometimes they aren’t even friendly!) Criticism.
My second broad motivation was to connect the pluralism of CTS to important wider contexts within academia and the ‘real world’ of global politics, and to reflect on the stakes of different visions for the future of CTS. What is particularly important here is the emerging, broadly resonant work of real interest in: CTS’s own biases, omissions and exclusions, often associated with issues of race and colonialism. This work raises profound questions about the future viability of CTS. Some authors even argue for CTS. Abolition of the broader field of terrorism studies.
In short, my argument is that critical terrorism studies has developed around three identifiable phases or ‘waves’. Each of these waves has its own ambitions, focus and context, and each tends to draw from different theoretical and normative inspirations. The first wave of CTS, which emerged in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, focused its efforts on establishing the foundations for a new, explicitly critical approach to the study of terrorism. As a result, this – Agenda setting – Criticize so-called ‘traditional’ terrorism research, CTS’s core concept commitmentsand express it normative vision. Despite some internal disagreements, particularly over the meaning of ‘criticism’, in retrospect the first wave of CTS was relatively coherent and laid an important foundation for subsequent scholarship in the field.
The second wave of critical terrorism studies built on previous work. Fairytale We explain what CTS means and what it can do. As the war on terror escalated and new forms of (counter)terrorism emerged, this wave mobilized widespread energies that pushed CTS into new empirical, theoretical, and methodological directions. Part of this movement included a concerted effort to introduce CTS to new students and scholars through: textbook, edited collections, and special issues. In addition, new analysis of contexts and cases that have been overlooked so far and New interdisciplinary connections With other academic disciplines or projects. Important discussions included in this wave include: Usefulness of the term ‘state terrorism’And the scope that CTS should pursue policy related. The result of this work is a vibrant, pluralistic and ambitious work with close attention to nuance throughout.
The third wave of critical terrorism studies consists of more recent scholarship that broadly resonates with the ambitions of the previous waves but is also interested in unpacking CTS. limits and silence. It underpins much of this work. Problematization – The argument goes like this: CTS has yet to fully address racism, gender, and other rooted and inherited issues.. Because of this, there is a real risk that CTS will replicate the many forms of violence it has previously sought to arrest. The stakes here are therefore fundamentally political and perhaps even existential for CTS. Third Wave work interestingly takes us back to this: politics of criticism This was very important for the first wave of CTS operations.
My understanding that CTS evolves through waves of agenda setting, elaboration, and problematization is, of course, a bit artificial in that it omits (necessarily) important work in the field and attributes coherence to a variety of authors and scholars. Each of these three moments. However, it helps address the different approaches and ambitions of critical terrorism studies and their emergence at specific historical moments. It is likely, then, that events occurring within and outside of academia over the next 20 years will have a decisive impact on the future of CTS. Will Third Wave work make CTS redundant or too politically compromised for future relevance? Will broader academic developments introduce new techniques, tools, or theories that are applicable to critical terrorism studies? Will ‘terrorism’ rise or fall in political significance around the world, affecting its status within academia? Will there be a fourth wave of CTS? So what will that wave look like? Of course, at this point, such questions can only be answered through speculation. But my hope is that CTS’s past progress in embracing pluralism and internal disagreement has given it both the tools and the desire to remain resilient and relevant for some time to come.
This article is a new work by Lee Jarvis. ‘Three waves of critical terrorism studies: agenda setting, elaboration and problematization’.First published Critical Study of Terrorism May 23, 2024.
Additional Resources on E-International Relations
